Infrastructure: Emerging Markets versus the World

Harry mentioned investing in infrastructure and that got me thinking.

I like infrastructure plays because typically spending in this area just makes good sense. For one thing, good infrastructure provides a stable foundation for economic growth. Countries that underinvest in infrastructure claim they’re saving money, but in reality they’re choking off future growth.

What’s more, it’s possible for governments, and the private companies with which they contract, to earn positive rates of return on infrastructure investments. Toll roads, for example, provide streams of income that work to pay back initial investments.

The same cannot be said for all government spending, as is the case with many social programs.

But these aren’t the issues that piqued my curiosity when Harry mentioned infrastructure investment. Instead, I began to wonder how the infrastructure investment trend would look in the emerging world compared to the developed world…

To gain some insight, I pulled up charts of two infrastructure funds – the iShares Global Infrastructure Index (IGF) and the iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure fund (EMIF). The latter would tell me what’s happening in the emerging world, where infrastructure spending is in a rapid “catch up” phase.

Here are two charts that I found particularly interesting…

First, since the start of 2012, amidst the backdrop of a bullish equity market, the Emerging Market Infrastructure fund (EMIF) outperformed the Global Infrastructure Fund (IGF) by nearly four-to-one. EMIF is up 10.7% year-to-date, while IGF is above water to by just 2.9%.

See larger image

But looking back to 2011 shows a different perspective…

Here’s a chart of the Emerging Markets fund in orange, the Global fund in in green and a ratio of the two funds in yellow.

See larger image

The sharply declining ratio I’ve highlighted shows that the Emerging Market fund’s outperformance deteriorated between April and October 2011. This came during a significant market downturn, when the S&P 500 lost about 15%.

What does this ratio comparison tell me?

Well, both EMIF and IGF declined during this period. But the Emerging Market Infrastructure fund’s decline was steeper. In fact, EMIF lost nearly twice as much
(-31%) as IGF (-18%).

The conclusion seems straightforward. In bullish, risk-on environments emerging market infrastructure plays will outperform. But outperformance will come at the potential expense of increased volatility. That’s because in risk off environments, emerging market infrastructure plays tend to get hit harder.

If you haven’t done so already read the Survive & Prosper issue on “Is a Dow Jones Average of 3,300 Really Too Bearish?”

 

 

What You Need to Know About the Safe-Asset Slaughter!

You’re not going to believe what’s on the horizon…

The final bubble of the recent financial crisis is about to burst. When it pops – it could be as soon as November 2014 – millions of Americans will be financially devastated… But others will have the opportunity to get much richer.

This controversial video reveals how you can end up on the winning side of the coming carnage…

Click to Learn More
Categories: Economy

About Author

Adam O'Dell has one purpose in mind: to find and bring to subscribers investment opportunities that return the maximum profit with the minimum risk. Adam has worked as a Prop Trader for a spot Forex firm. While there, he learned the fundamentals of trading in the world’s largest market. He excelled at trading the volatile currency markets by seeking out low-risk entry points for trades with high profit potential. An MBA graduate and Affiliate Member of the Market Technicians Association, Adam is a lifelong student of the markets. He is editor of our hugely successful trading service, Cycle 9 Alert.