The Green Light on Global Stock Buying

The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) conducts a survey each week, simply asking investors: “Are you bullish, bearish or neutral?” Consider it an appraisal of the market’s mood. A mood ring, if you will.

For 80 of the last 82 weeks, optimism has run below the survey’s long-term average. That’s a long stretch of pessimism.

Last week’s AAII survey shows that the market’s mood still falls on the negative side.

Currently…

  • 37% of respondents labeled themselves “bearish” (an above-average reading).
  • 39% labeled themselves as “neutral” (an above-average reading).
  • And only 24% called themselves “bullish” (a below-average reading).

Considering the mounting number of global risk factors, over-inflated stock valuations and our own forecast of economic trouble ahead, it’s not at all surprising to see investors gripped with doubt and fear.

Clearly, pessimism is the market’s dominant psychological trend.

Meanwhile, though, the dominant trend in stock prices is still positive.

I explained this to my Cycle 9 Alert readers last week, when I shared with them charts that show the majority of stock markets – both in the U.S. and abroad – are in long-term uptrends. (Note: Cycle 9 Alert is designed to hold positions for three months at a time, so “long-term” to me and my subscribers is about six months).

This sounds perverse, but it’s actually the way the stock market typically works. When investors are especially fearful, stock prices tend to rise. And when investors are especially confident, stock prices tend to fall.

And since most investors are currently pessimistic and fearful, I suspect they’re overlooking the bullish opportunity in global stocks today.

Not only are investors especially nervous about buying stocks today, they’ve long favored the relative safety of U.S. stocks.

For many reasons – good or bad – U.S. investors almost always feel safer buying U.S. stocks. It’s an illusion of course… but most U.S. investors feel like they understand, and can control the risks of investing in, companies based in the United States, relative to foreign companies.

The idea of investors’ home-country bias isn’t new. It’s a behavioral phenomenon that’s well-documented and pervasive. I suppose, for some investors, it’s a case of the devil you know is better than the devil you don’t.

Either way, home-country bias causes many investors to foolishly pass over investments that are best positioned for strong performance, in favor of investments that make them feel comfortable.

U.S. stocks have had a great run in recent years – outperforming almost every other country’s stock markets by a long run. But that trend of U.S. outperformance can’t last forever. And I’m currently seeing signs that suggest foreign stocks are likely to outperform in the months ahead.

According to Nautilus Research, an institutional quant shop, something unique happened last month: more than 15% of global stock market indices hit a new one-year high. This represents the global market’s strongest breadth in more than two years.

Historically, this global buy signal has led to consistent and strong performance of global stock markets.

On average, foreign stocks have gained 1.7%, 3.1%, 6.2% and 9.7% over the following one, three, six and 12 months, respectively. And those gains are far stronger than global stocks’ typical returns over the same time-frames (of 0.5%, 1.5%, 2.9% and 5.9%).

Now, I fully realize that buying any (global or foreign) stocks at today’s valuations is scary. The cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio (CAPE) for U.S. stocks is sitting around 26.5, more than 65% above its long-run median of 16.

Yes, stocks are expensive!

But that doesn’t mean you should altogether avoid buying stocks!

History shows that, despite an “expensive” CAPE ratio, stocks can still move strongly higher. Consider a number of the historical global buy signals Nautilus Research identified.

The MSCI World Stock Index returned…

  • 22% between January ’93 and ’94 (despite a CAPE of 20.3).
  • 12% between July ’95 and ’96 (despite a CAPE of 23.4).
  • 20% between October ’96 and ’97 (despite a CAPE of 26.5).
  • 18% between February ’98 and ’99 (despite a CAPE of 34.7).
  • 11% between April 1999 and 2000 (despite a CAPE of 42.7).

Do you see the trend?

Between 1993 and 2000, stock valuations grew increasingly expensive. Yet, world stock markets repeatedly offered investors double-digit annual gains.

To be fair, the CAPE ratio was designed to be an ultra-long-term valuation tool. Most investors don’t realize it has little to no value if your investment strategy calls for holding investments for less than five or 10 years.

Still, the CAPE ratio is one of the most-often cited valuation metrics in the financial media. And so I suspect more than a few investors psych themselves out of buying stocks at today’s valuations, for fear of turning into the proverbial “sucker” who buys the market’s last shares at nose-bleed prices.

I hope this misconception doesn’t deter you from finding the most profitable short-term investments in today’s market.

And I hope you’ll consider taking a look at my Cycle 9 Alert research service, which has consistently identified the market’s best short-term plays, since 2012.

Currently, foreign stock markets are both trending higher and showing market-beating momentum, according to my Cycle 9 Alert algorithm.

My system has triggered a number of buy signals on foreign markets in recent weeks, including: China (FXI), Hong Kong (EWH), South Korea (EWY), Australia (EWA), France (EWQ), Germany (EWG) and, most recently, Japan (EWJ).

This overwhelming convergence of buy signals in foreign stock markets is too strong to ignore. And I’ve recently given my Cycle 9 Alert readers a new recommendation for taking advantage of this unique situation.

We got into the trade only yesterday, so there’s still time to get in if you act fast.

Adam O’Dell

Editor, Cycle 9 Alert

P.S. I want to be absolutely clear here. I am in no way saying that a market crash isn’t likely. Nor am I contradicting Harry’s forecast in any way. The beauty of Harry’s and my work is that it is complementary. Harry looks at the long term. I look at the short term. Harry is warning passive investors to stay out of the market. I 100% agree with him. But Harry would be the first to tell you to grab opportunities in any market, as and when they present themselves.

In fact, that’s the major theme running through his latest best-seller, The Sale of a Lifetime. And again, I agree with him. And as the Dent Research Chief Investment Strategist, and creator and Editor of both Cycle 9 Alert and Max Profit Alert, it is my job to keep you actively and strategically invested in the opportunities that are out there.

What Killed the Middle Class?

Today real incomes of the middle class are 5% lower than they were in 1970 and 12.4% lower than in 2000… when they peaked! How could this be?

In our new infographic What Killed the Middle Class?, we take a look at some shocking numbers to show how bad it’s become and what has been fueling this middle-class revolt.

 

LEARN MORE
Categories: Foreign Markets

About Author

Adam O'Dell has one purpose in mind: to find and bring to subscribers investment opportunities that return the maximum profit with the minimum risk. Adam has worked as a Prop Trader for a spot Forex firm. While there, he learned the fundamentals of trading in the world’s largest market. He excelled at trading the volatile currency markets by seeking out low-risk entry points for trades with high profit potential. An MBA graduate and Affiliate Member of the Market Technicians Association, Adam is a lifelong student of the markets. He is editor of our hugely successful trading service, Cycle 9 Alert.